One-to-One: SmarTeam Customers Talk About PLM for SMB
I had the chance to talk with … several ENOVIA SmarTeam customers during my recent research.
I talked with them for my paper on how mid-sized manufacturers have leveraged product innovation and PLM to get through challenging economic times and come out better during the recovery. See my Research Rap: Small to Midsize Manufacturer in an Economic Downturn? Innovate! for an overview of the findings from the study (along with a link to the study if you are interested). The customers offered some very good perspective on the use of PLM by small to medium-sized business (SMB), which drives home a point that often gets lost in the grander discussion of enterprise PLM. Smaller companies need the basics of PLM, without the overhead of a large “enterprise transformation” sized implementation project.What do they Offer?
I blogged about SmarTeam earlier this year, so I won’t reiterate the basics of their offerings. Instead, I would like to focus on the needs of smaller companies and what I learned from the manufacturers I spoke to for the study. It actually matches up nicely with a recent blog conversation on PLMtwine on PLM Action Plan for Dummies.
What does an SMB Look for in PLM? Controlling Data
In short, the companies I spoke with were looking to gain control of their product data. In the PLMtwine blog, Oleg lists that as step number 1. The driver for each of the manufacturers interviewed was different, but the need to find a way to quickly get their product data in control was key. For one lighting manufacturer, the business driver was a significantly depressed local economy and the need to move to a new market (both geographically, but also with a more sophisticated product set). For a manufacturer of ladders, the challenge was a significant financial setback in their business, the need to run very lean, and the extension of their business into a multi-site, global operation as they moved production to Mexico. Despite the driver, the need was a way to control the complexities of their product data in an easy way, and share product data across their organization.
What does an SMB Look for in PLM? Controlling Change
The next core capability that smaller companies were addressing was tightly aligned with controlling data, controlling engineering changes. I would normally say controlling “processes,” but in this case it was clear that engineering change (followed by release to manufacturing) was the big pain they were addressing with PLM (as opposed generic “process control.” Engineering change is a messy process in many businesses, and one that leads to manufacturing confusion and errors. Although I have been in recent conversations on the priority of developing a strong process versus applying technology to solve the problem, the truth is that both are very valuable. The companies interviewed all discussed the importance of the engineering change processes, and pointed to significant improvements through the use of PLM technology (ENOVIA SmarTeam in this case).
SMB Wish List for PLM
Smaller manufacturers have many of the same PLM needs as larger companies, but far fewer resources to achieve them. So what does an SMB look for in PLM? Based on my interview with the SmarTeam customers, they were looking for:
- Rapid Implementation
- Ease of Use
- Pre-populated Best Practices
- Pre-defined Templates and Data Models
- The Ability to Start Small (and add new capabilities when they are ready for them, what I call a “PLM Program” approach)
- Stability and Ease of Technical Implementation
- Integration with Product Designs (CAD, for the most part)
- Easy Integration to ERP
So that’s what I hear from SmarTeam’s customers, I hope you found it useful. What do you think? What else should I have asked them?
Ex-SmarTeam worker commented:
Bad news, SmarTeam closed by Dassault, so this article is non-relevant anymore.
Jim Brown, Tech-Clarity commented:
Vinod, thank you for your reply (and sorry for my slow reply, travel has gotten the best of me recently).
You ask a great question. Wouldn't even the largest companies want a PLM solution that is easy to use, integrates well, and offers a pre-defined environment to get started? Of course. But they are typically also less willing to compromise. Where a smaller manufacturer may be willing to adapt their configuration management or change control process to the pre-defined "best practice" in the software, larger companies may have spent significant effort defining their own "best" or maybe even "next" practice that works for their business. Larger companies sometimes think harder about their processes, and are more willing (and able) to configure the solution on their own. They may also be willing to trade off a rapid implementation for other needs. For example, do they need to synchronize large CAD files across multiple, global organizations? How important is it to have support for specific security or regulatory requirements (ITAR for example)? Sometimes those needs will be more important. Or, they may have a specific set of architectural requirements for software to fit in with their global infrastructure. Most smaller companies can't afford to worry about these kinds of things.
Now, having said that, can larger companies use simpler solutions? Absolutely! SmarTeam is in use by big and small companies. So is Arena Solutions. I think we will see PTC's ProductPoint picked up by some larger organizations. Sometimes the simple approach is better for big manufacturers too.
I hope that helps, let me know what you think.
Vinod Kumar commented:
How different is SMB's wish list from other large players? it would be great if you can share your thoughts on specifics or differentiators for SMB's in adopting PLM.




















