Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to Manufacturing Business Technology
FirstLight 

Picking a PLM Vendor: Finding PLM Expertise

November 26, 2007

This series of posts turned the corner from
giving guidance on how to approach, justify, and define your path
to PLM and started the conversation on how to choose a vendor. The
last post discussed how to find an industry specialist, but it
brought up a good question - how do you find a PLM specialist in
the first place?

A friend of mine called the other day looking for
a PLM consultant to help out on a project. He was looking for an
individual to subcontract because he doesn’t have the skills
in-house to run a PLM implementation. He (and his company) have
very skilled people for implementing enterprise applications, but
needed to supplement with a PLM specialist. That had me asking the
question, how can you tell whether a consultant or systems
integrator (SI) has depth and experience in PLM?
Here
are a number of ideas:

  • Look for focus - Let’s face it,
    PLM is hot. It is growing faster than most (if not all) enterprise
    applications, and our research at Aberdeen shows that it provides a
    path to profitable growth. Because of this, many consultants are
    starting to list “PLM” as one of their capabilities. But where is
    it placed in their business? Did it make it to their website
    because Marketing thought it was hot, or because they have a focus
    on it? One way to be sure it to find a focused company. Looking at
    a specialist like Kalypso is
    an example, you see “Products - Ideas - Innovation” and “Delivering
    on the promise of innovation” right up front. Sure that’s
    marketing, but it’s focused marketing, and a generalist can’t
    afford to spend that much time on one subject like PLM.
  • Look for the people - For
    larger companies, like a large consultant, it can be harder. They
    are in many lines of business, and they now probably list PLM as
    one of them. But how can you tell that they are
    capable in PLM? In these companies, you have to look beyond
    the home page and look at their people. Do they have dedicated
    resources to PLM? IBM, a
    longstanding member of the PLM community, serves as an example.
    Even within the breadth of IBM, there is room for specialization. I
    recently attended an industry event where they announced a series
    of
    PLM Centers of Excellence
     around the globe. This is how a
    larger company shows their dedication to helping companies like you
    with PLM.
  • Look at the company they keep -
    Who are their partners? Do they partner with Dassault Systemes,
    PTC, or Siemens PLM (UGS)? Do they attend those vendors’ events?
    What other trade shows do they invest in? Do they attend PDMA?
    COFES? NDES? Do they know what those shows are? If they have to
    ask, they may not be focused (with one caveat, that industry
    specialists will probably list more focused industry
    shows).
  • Look for their customer
    successes
    - In the end, it is about their customers. How
    quickly can you identify some companies like you (preferably in
    your industry) that have accomplished the kinds of things with PLM
    that you hope to? Ideally these are on the website, but you may
    have to dig a little bit deeper.

By the way, this test also applies to ERP
vendors who list “PLM” as one of their modules or
capabilities
, but that should be for another
post.

I look forward to your comments. Feel free to
share your experience in selecting a vendor, your suggestions might
save someone a lot of headaches…

Posted by Jim Brown on November 26, 2007 | Comments (2)

December 10, 2007
In response to: Picking a PLM Vendor: Finding PLM Expertise
Jim Brown commented:







HK, thanks for your comment. In short - absolutely! What we have
found is that a PLM Program approach breaks PLM into much smaller,
achievable projects. The one thing to watch out for, though, is to
put a strategy in place first. A PLM Program approach is not a
mandate for a lot of disjointed projects. I know a number or large
SI's that would agree with this approach, although I have also seen
the mega-projects that seem to go on forever. It may help to
partner with a consulting firm to develop a strategy, but then
commit to smaller implementation projects to build to the overall
vision.


November 30, 2007
In response to: Picking a PLM Vendor: Finding PLM Expertise
HK commented:







Hello Jim, One of my experiences have been with the SI's is that
they go for big bang approach which makes implementation very long
and leads to painful system adoption. Do you think going for phased
approach would make the implementations smoother and allow
companies to get ROI quicker? Thanks, - Hardik Kansupada

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
ARCbanner
NEWSLETTERS
Mid-Day Report
Innovation Strategies
Intelligent Manufacturing
Lean Enterprise



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites