Global MBT:
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
 
Get Lean and Prosper   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (2)


Lean and Deming's Anti-Slogan Views
June 25, 2008

Earlier leanblog.org post and comment

Last week, I posted about Deming's 14 points and I got an interesting question from a blog reader, Brian:
I found # 10 confounding: "Eliminate slogans, exhortations and targets."

Slogans are sometimes used to communicate change. While they are just a tiny ingredient in a large recipe for communicating change, they can be effective.

We use targets in our Lean improvement workshops so the team can measure their success at the end of the week.

Is Deming really for eliminating these or am I not understanding his intent? Are some of our Lean practices in opposition to his principles?

Here is my take on it, based on my experience and study of Dr. Deming's teachings. First thought is that when I visited NUMMI in 2005, I saw a lot of large banners with slogans, including their annual Quality Slogan. I thought this was surprising, considering the influence Deming had on Toyota, but someone explained that slogans are OK as long as they aren't "empty slogans." I would never put up signs during a hospital Lean project that exhort people, "Quality is YOUR responsibility." No, it's management's responsibility. We have to improve systems, not exhort people.

I agree that slogans and sayings can be helpful. One team I'm working with now has really embraced the expression, "Don't let best get in the way of better." We don't have it on signs all over the place. Is it a slogan? I guess. Is it bad, I don't think so, since the expression encourages them to take a PDCA approach, try something and see how it works, rather than obsessing over a perfect solution.

Now for targets... my take is that targets and measures for improvement are a good thing. I consider them "goals" more than "targets" and I think there's more to that than the choice of words.

For example, in a project, we expect to improve testing Turnaround Time from XX hours to XX minutes, based on analysis of the process and knowing how much waste there is. Tracking the improvement goals isn't a bad thing. What would be bad is setting an absolute "you must hit this or be punished" target for a project team or staff. Setting quotas such as "you must draw blood from 10 patients per hour, or else" would be a very bad thing, something that Dr. Deming railed against.

What we're trying to avoid is the old "Management by Objectives" sins of managers just hitting targets and then waiting to see the results. We need managers involved in managing and improving the process, not just hitting targets that are often unrealistic. If you set quotas or targets and threaten punishment (or lack of reward) then people will distort the data or they will distort the system - something we really want to avoid.

I hope that helps. What are YOUR perspectives on the use of slogans and targets? I hope we can agree that exhortations are bad, right?





Posted by Mark Graban on June 25, 2008 | Comments (2)


September 11, 2008
In response to: Lean and Deming's Anti-Slogan Views
Lean lmao commented:

I have been now with multiple companies that have gone to the Lean mfg. process. All I have to say is ,If you want profits up and quality down its great. If you have any sense of quality commitment then lean will never work. Ask any company that has gone to it how many hidden recalls they have due to having to use inferior parts to meet ship dates and you will get a reality check. Lean is a sham, It was created to make a bad stock look good since most stock anylists who have no clue look at free cash in rating a stock now its just another econimic band-aid. Its all about charts-n-graphs, make your charts then before paying your bills and it all looks pretty.




September 18, 2008
In response to: Lean and Deming's Anti-Slogan Views
shyam commented:

Lean lmao, from your comments it looks like the multiple companies you worked with did do the initial part of the lean implementation perfectly. All the quality issues that were hidden till then came out into the open. Inferior parts previously stocked away as WIP inventory had to come out to fill shipping schedules. Perfect! Atleast, now the company should have woken up to the quality issues and found ways to improve them. That wouldve been the next phase of lean implementation--Kaizen projects at improving quality. But looks like the multiple companies you worked with didn't make the effort of doing it, in the process got disheartened with Lean and went back to old ways, thereby missing an opportunity at improving quality. Lean wouldnt work in pieces. If you have lower inventories, you better ensure that your quality is also improved. Quality commitment is not just about the quality of products shipped out, its about quality throughout the process.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:


Advertisement

Advertisements





About Us    |    Advertising Info    |   Site Map    |   Contact Us    |    FREE Subscription    |   Affiliate Links    |    RSS
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites