Global MBT:
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Get Lean and Prosper   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (1)


Changing Glass vs. Pouring a Glass
May 26, 2008


One thing I observed at the Stars/Red Wings playoff game last Wednesday is that the arena crew could pretty much swap out one of the pieces of plexiglass behind the net faster than the concession crew could pour a glass of beer.

Two players crashed into the boards.... something got cracked or dislodged. A crew came out and, with almost-NASCAR pit crew efficiency, they replaced the glass. You could tell it was designed for a quick swap out and the team must have practiced. This isn't required every game, but thankfully they could keep the delay from being no longer than a normal TV timeout.

Now the concession stand... they are particularly bad at the American Airlines Center. They're learning their operational approach from their namesake airline, I'm guessing. Why do concession stands insist on "pouring to order" when customers order beer during an intermission? The typical process:

  1. Customer orders
  2. Employee starts to pour beer
  3. Employee waits for foam to subside
  4. Employee continues pouring
  5. Employee waits again for form to subside
  6. Employee finishes beer
  7. Customer pays
It seems like some simple kaizen could improve the efficiency of the whole operation without adding people -- good for the arena (more revenue, since fewer customers would walk away from a slow line) and good for the customers (less waiting).
If you separated the work of pouring beer and taking payment, you could have someone pouring two beers in parallel, taking advantage of the "waiting" time on one beer to pour the other. Have that one beer pourer handing beers to multiple register attendants.
Another idea -- when you know things are going to be busy (such as pre-game or intermission), why not have a simple "beer kanban?" You could keep a few beers "in process" between the pouring and the register. The beers would keep moving (as long as you had First-In-First-Out) and you'd have a beer that had been poured pretty freshly. Really, what's the difference in a Miller Lite that's JUST been poured or one that was poured 60 seconds ago. They're still bad beer.
I don't know all of the answers, obviously. It's just frustrating to see the lack of kaizen in a setting as simple as a beer and hot dog stand. The concession stand is just as slow each game and each year. There's no sign of improvement. I wonder if they think they are as good as they can get or if nobody is challenging them to improve? Is nobody allowing them to improve? Dr. Deming would say that everybody is entitled to being able to find joy in their work -- even if that work is pouring beer, eh?


Posted by Mark Graban on May 26, 2008 | Comments (1)


May 27, 2008
In response to: Changing Glass vs. Pouring a Glass
bonsaiforyourbusiness commented:

My experience is that most people already think that they are doing "it" as well as can be done, particularly in a small business setting. My thing about observations like what you have here is that the improvement is not only free, but actually increases revenue and decreases costs, but management may even be resistant to ideas like this. I'd love to hear from others on how they go about selling these ideas in their companies and/or to prospective clients.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:


Advertisement

Advertisements





About Us    |    Advertising Info    |   Site Map    |   Contact Us    |    FREE Subscription    |   Affiliate Links    |    RSS
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites